Table 2.

DALYs averted (millions) with the dietary scenarios

	UK	France	Italy	Sweden	Finland
Men
Diet meets nutrition recommendations	15 (13–17)	7.0 (6.3–7.7)	4.7 (4.3–5.1)	1.4 (1.3–1.5)	2.3 (2.1–2.6)
+no GHGE increase	15 (14–17)	6.8 (6.2–7.5)	4.7 (4.3–5.1)	1.3 (1.2–1.4)	2.3 (2.1–2.6)
+10% GHGE reduction	15 (14–17)	6.7 (6.2–7.5)	4.6 (4.3–5.0)	1.3 (1.2–1.4)	2.3 (2.1–2.6)
+20% GHGE reduction	15 (14–17)	7.0 (6.3–7.8)	4.2 (3.9–4.5)	1.2 (1.1–1.3)	2.3 (2.0–2.5)
+30% GHGE reduction	15 (14–17)	7.3 (6.5–8.0)	4.5 (4.2–4.8)	1.3 (1.2–1.4)	2.2 (1.9–2.4)
+40% GHGE reduction	16 (14–18)	6.4 (5.8–7.1)	4.7 (4.3–5.0)	1.3 (1.2–1.4)	2.5 (2.2–2.8)
+50% GHGE reduction	21 (19–23)	5.9 (5.4–6.6)	7.4 (7.0–7.9)	1.1 (1.0–1.3)	2.5 (2.2–2.8)
+60% GHGE reduction	20 (18–23)	5.8 (5.3–6.4)	12.4 (11.7–13.2)	2.0 (1.9–2.2)	2.5 (2.2–2.8)
+70% GHGE reduction	20 (17–22)	–	–	1.8 (1.7–2.0)	2.6 (2.3–2.9)
GHGE minimised	19 (17–22)	5.5 (5.0–6.1)	12.6 (11.7–13.4)	1.8 (1.7–2.0)	2.5 (2.2– 2.8)
Women
Diet meets nutrition recommendations	13 (11–14)	7.9 (7.2–8.7)	4.9 (4.5–5.4)	0.8 (0.7–0.8)	1.6 (1.3–1.8)
+no GHGE increase	13 (11–14)	7.7 (7.1–8.5)	5.1 (4.7–5.6)	0.8 (0.7–0.9)	1.5 (1.3–1.7)
+10% GHGE reduction	13 (12–14)	6.5 (5.8–7.2)	4.9 (4.5–5.5)	0.8 (0.7–0.9)	1.7 (1.4–2.0)
+20% GHGE reduction	13 (12–14)	6.2 (5.5–7.0)	4.8 (4.4–5.4)	0.8 (0.8–0.9)	1.7 (1.5–2.1)
+30% GHGE reduction	16 (14–18)	6.3 (5.6–7.0)	5.5 (5.1–6.0)	0.9 (0.8–0.9)	1.8 (1.5–2.1)
+40% GHGE reduction	17 (16–19)	5.9 (5.2–6.6)	5.7 (5.2–6.2)	1.5 (1.4–1.6)	1.9 (1.6–2.3)
+50% GHGE reduction	18 (16–20)	4.6 (4.0–5.3)	11.3 (10.5–12.2)	1.5 (1.4–1.6)	1.8 (1.5–2.2)
+60% GHGE reduction	19 (17–21)	11.4 (9.9–13.1)	14.7 (13.5–16.1)	1.4 (1.3–1.6)	2.0 (1.7–2.3)
+70% GHGE reduction	–	–	–	–	2.1 (1.8–2.4)
GHGE minimised	20 (18–22)	15.1 (13.3–17.4)	12.5 (11.5–13.7)	1.5 (1.4–1.6)	2.3 (1.9–2.7)

Values are mean and 95% uncertainty intervals, in millions. Where values are missing, no solution could be found in the linear programming