Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 12;2017(10):CD007498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007498.pub3

Comparison 1. Procalcitonin algorithm versus no procalcitonin algorithm stratified by clinical setting.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality at 30 days 32 10046 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.78, 1.01]
1.1 Primary care trials 2 1008 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.01, 7.98]
1.2 Emergency department trials 14 3805 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.70, 1.36]
1.3 Intensive care unit trials 16 5233 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.77, 1.00]
2 Treatment failure at 30 days 32 10046 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.81, 0.99]
2.1 Primary care trials 2 1008 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.72, 1.22]
2.2 Emergency department trials 14 3805 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.69, 1.05]
2.3 Intensive care unit trials 16 5233 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.81, 1.05]