Long 2014.
Methods | Randomised, single‐centre, open‐label, controlled clinical trial in Shanghai, China | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria: People aged 18 to 65 years with severe acute exacerbations of asthma. A severe asthma exacerbation was defined as at least 1 of the following: need for systemic corticosteroids, or an increase from a stable maintenance dose, for at least 3 days and/or hospitalisation or ED visit because of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids. Exclusion criteria: People with antibiotic use within the previous 14 days, psychiatric disorders or other inability to give written informed consent, not being available for follow‐up, severe immunosuppression, heart failure, cystic fibrosis, active tuberculosis, pregnancy, and chest radiography–confirmed pneumonia Included in this study: 180/216 screened individuals were eligible for the study (90 intervention group, 90 non‐intervention group); 169 finished the follow‐up. | |
Interventions | Guiding antibiotic decisions in people with acute severe exacerbation of asthma Algorithm used in this study: Antibiotic treatment was strongly discouraged when serum PCT level was less than 0.1 μg/L; antibiotic treatment was discouraged when serum PCT level was less than 0.25 μg/L; and antibiotic treatment was encouraged when serum PCT level was higher than 0.25 μg/L. When antibiotics were withheld from participants, a second measurement of the PCT level was mandatory within 6 to 24 hours for safety reasons. The use of antibiotics was recommended if this second measurement was higher than 0.25 μg/L. Physicians were permitted to overrule the algorithm, but they had to indicate the reasons for overruling. The control group received antibiotic according to the discretion of the treating physician, who was unaware of the participant’s PCT levels. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Funding: The study was sponsored by a grant from the Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital Science Foundation and Minhang District Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai. The funding bodies had no involvement in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Follow‐up time: 12 months Registration: ChiCTR‐TRC‐12002534 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation to either intervention was conducted according to computer‐generated random numbers produced by an independent statistician. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | After randomisation, an opaque, sealed, sequentially numbered envelope containing the PCT or control protocol was prepared for each participant according to group assignment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Open‐label study with blinding of PCT level in the control group |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding of outcome assessment mentioned in the study. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 169/180 participants completed 1‐year follow‐up visit (11 participants lost to follow‐up). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcomes correspond to study protocol. Trial registered (ChiCTR‐TRC‐12002534). |
Other bias | Low risk | High adherence to PCT algorithm (93.3%) |