Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Care. 2007 Jul;19(6):781–790. doi: 10.1080/09540120601163227

Table 4.

Household composition and socio-economic status, among children <15 years old and living in the district at the time of follow-up

HIV status of index individual
HIV+ HIV− p value
Living with parents % (n) % (n)
Both parents 34 1 (46) 77 (509)
Mother only 28 (38) 12 (79)
Father only 9 (12) 6 (40)
Neither parent 28 (38) 5 (37)
(134) (665) <0.001
Household head 2
Father 42 (56) 83 (547)
Mother 16 (22) 4 (24)
Grandparent 20 (27) 6 (40)
Aunt/uncle 12 (16) 2 (14)
Sibling/Sibling-in-law 1.5 (2) 1 (8)
Other relation 2 (3) 4 (29)
Not blood relative 6 (8) 0 (0)
(134) (662) <0.001
Age of household head (years)
19-29 1 (2) 3 (20)
30-39 30 (40) 32 (215)
40-49 31 (41) 33 (221)
50-59 18 (24) 19 (129)
60-82 20 (27) 12 (77)
(134) (662) 0.10
Sex of household head
Male 78 (104) 93 (616)
Female 22 (30) 7 (46)
(134) (662) <0.001
Household head female >60 years old
No 96 (128) 98 (650)
Yes 4 (6) 2 (12)
(134) (662) 0.06
Male adult aged 18-49 in household
No 25 (34) 23 (149)
Yes 75 (100) 77 (513)
(134) (662) 0.47
Female adult aged 18-49 in household
No 8 (11) 4 (25)
Yes 92 (123) 96 (637)
(134) (662) 0.02
Household assets 3
Score ≤3 39 (52) 38 (245)
Score >3 61 (82) 62 (405)
(134) (650) 0.81
Housing quality 4
Score ≤2 50 (62) 58 (371)
Score >2 50 (61) 42 (273)
(123) (644) 0.14
1

Figures in bold are referred to in the text;

2

Household head not identified for 3 children of an HIV-negative index individual;

3

Higher scores imply more and/or more valuable possessions;

4

The construction of walls, roof, floor and windows were scored according to building materials and the component scores were summed. Higher scores imply more solid/expensive constructions