Chanta 2015.
Methods | RCT Duration: 2 years, 11 months (June 2010 to May 2013) Adverse event monitoring: patient report |
|
Participants | Children with positive scrub typhus RDT Number randomized: 57 Inclusion criteria: hospitalized children ≤ 15 years of age; clinical manifestations compatible with scrub typhus; confirmatory laboratory tests Exclusion criteria: allergy to study drug; severe clinical complications (hypotension, coma, respiratory failure, acute renal failure with renal replacement therapy); anti‐microbial therapy < 7 days pre‐admission Laboratory diagnosis: dipstick RDT (SD Bioline Tsutsugamushi test) |
|
Interventions |
*Changed to "standard treatment" if clinical failure †Children under 8 received chloramphenicol; children 8 and older received doxycycline |
|
Outcomes |
*Temperature < 37.3°C maintained for > 48 hours |
|
Notes | Country: Thailand Setting: tertiary hospital, paediatrics unit Funding: Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital fund Follow‐up: 1 month after discharge |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomization; no further details |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | "Open‐label"; no further details |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 57 randomized after RDT positive diagnosis. No missing data (57/57) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes adequately reported. Adverse events defined as those "related to the administration of the antibiotic" |
Other bias | Low risk | No obvious other sources of bias |