Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;14(4):e0216128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216128

Fig 3. The coefficient of homophily (α′) was slightly less positive when calculated for two-author papers only, relative to papers with longer author lists.

Fig 3

The individual points, whose distribution is summarised by the violin plots, correspond to individual journals. The larger white points show the mean for each group (and its 95% CIs), as calculated by a Bayesian meta-regression model accounting for repeated measures of α′ within journals, as well as the precision with which α′ was estimated.