Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD003964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003964.pub3
Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Losses to follow‐up/withdrawals: None

Participants
  • Setting: inpatients recruited from university teaching hospital

  • Country: China

  • Ethnicity: Chinese

  • Primary nephrotic syndrome diagnosed on "the National Diagnostic Criteria for Nephrotic Syndrome in Children"

  • Course of disease: treatment group (71.50 (34.70) days); control group (64.00 (21.46) days)

  • Number: 54

  • Mean age: 5.4 years (range 1.9 to 8.9)

  • Gender (M/F): 39/15


Exclusion criteria: NS
Interventions Treatment group
  • IVIG

    • Dose: 100 to 300 mg/kg/d

    • Total times for all participants: 56 times

    • Average dose/time: 237± 140 mg/kg

    • Duration: 2 to 3 days

  • Baseline treatment

    • Standard steroid protocol for nephrotic children

    • Immunosuppressive agents depending on medical conditions of the patients


Control group
  • Baseline treatment

    • Standard steroid protocol for nephrotic children

    • Immunosuppressive agents depending on medical conditions of the patients


Duration of follow ‐up: NS
Outcomes
  • Nosocomial infection

    • Diagnostic criteria: criteria for nosocomial infection established by both USA and China

  • Adverse events

Notes
  • Spectrum of nosocomial infection in order of incidence: respiratory infection, UTI , diarrhoea, skin infection

  • Spectrum of microorganisms: three microorganisms were cultured with E. coli (2) predominant in UTI

  • Source of funding: NS

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The study did not provide the information on the method of random sequence generation, and only presented with the data as "all participants with nephrotic syndrome were randomly allocated to treatment and control groups".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk The study did not provide the information on allocation concealment.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk The study did not provide the information on blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk There were no missing data in this study.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk There was insufficient information to make judgement.
Other bias Unclear risk There was insufficient information to make judgement.