Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 27;2014(4):CD003331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003331.pub4
Methods Parallel group RCT
Participants N Randomised: 50 (exercise 25; control 25)
Diagnosis (% of participants):
Aetiology: ischaemic; DCM (% not reported)
NYHA: not reported
LVEF: < 40% (% not reported)
Case mix: 100% as above
Age (yr): 55 (SD 10)
Male: 100% White: not reported
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Inclusion: CHF documented by clinical, angiographic or echocardiographic criteria; and resting EF < 40%
Exclusion: not reported
Interventions Exercise:Total duration: 1 month
Aerobic/resistance/mix: aerobic
Frequency: 5 sessions/wk
Duration: 30 min/session cycling, 90 min walking each day
Intensity: Borg 12‐14 (60‐80% max HR)
Modality: cycling and walking
Setting: indoor cycling sessions were supervised directly by a medical resident and outdoor walking sessions were supervised by exercise physiologists
Other: resided at the rehabilitation centre for 1 month. Programme component also included education and low‐fat meals prepared daily by the centre's cook
Outcomes Morbidity and mortality
Comparison Usual medical care
Country and setting Switzerland
Single centre
Follow‐up 6.2 yr (after randomisation)
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes described in the methods are reported in the results
Intention‐to‐treat analysis? Low risk ITT not stated explicitly. However, groups appear to analysed according to original allocation
Incomplete outcome data? Low risk "Data from one patient in the control group was not available at the two‐month evaluation due to refusal to complete testing." "Among subjects in the exercise group, 9 died, and one refused repeat testing. Among patients in the control group, 12 died and two refused repeat testing. Therefore, 14 and 13 patients performed six‐year evaluations in the exercise and control groups, respectively." QUORUM diagram reported and detailed text. No imputation undertaken
Groups balanced at baseline? Low risk "No differences were observed between the exercise and control groups initially in clinical or demographic data, including age, height, weight, pulmonary function or medication status"
Groups received same intervention? Unclear risk "Patients in the exercise group resided at the rehabilitation centre for one month. Control subjects received usual clinical care, including verbal encouragement to remain physically active"