Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 20;2017(11):CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4

da Silva Ribeiro 2015.

Methods RCT
Participants Recruited from an outpatient setting in Sao Paolo, Brazil
30 participants: 15 intervention, 15 control
Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐60 years with a diagnosis of stroke (based on neurologist assessment) and hemiparesis. Able to ambulate and hold the game controller without assistive devices. ≥ 6 months post stroke
Exclusion criteria: associated disorders (such as hemineglect or pusher syndrome), intellectual disability that made it difficult to understand the games or a history of orthopaedic diseases that promoted dysfunction in the limbs or prevented the performance of the proposed activity
Mean (SD) age: intervention group 53.7 (6.1) years, control group 52.8 (8.6) years
37% men
Stroke details: 57% right hemiparesis
Timing post stroke, mean (SD): intervention group 42.1 (26.9) months, control group 60.4 (44.) months
Interventions VR intervention: Nintendo Wii projected onto the wall. After full body stretching for 10 min the participants spent 50 min using the Nintendo Wii. The tennis and hula hoop games were used during the 1st session and soccer and boxing used during the second weekly session. The difficulty level of the games was increased as participants progressed
Control intervention: conventional physiotherapy including stretching, passive, active and resisted mobilisation activities, balance and gait activities and gripping activities
Sessions were 60 min, twice/week for 2 months with a physiotherapist
Outcomes Outcomes assessed post intervention
Upper limb function and activity: Fugl Meyer
Participation and quality of life: SF36
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number allocation (performed online)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Used envelopes but unclear if opaque or not
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Masked to allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Trial register not reported