Ma 2011.
Methods | RCT; simple computer‐based randomisation | |
Participants | Daily computer users with a history of computer‐related neck and shoulder discomfort; n = 72 | |
Interventions |
Biofeedback: portable biofeedback, two hours daily for two weeks; n = 15 Exercise: standardised exercise programme with stretching and strengthening exercises using Thera‐band, 20 minutes four times a day; n = 15 Passive treatment: interferential therapy (20 minutes) and hotpacks 15 minutes two times per week; n = 15 Control: standard educational booklet; n = 15 Intervention period: six weeks, follow‐up at six months |
|
Outcomes | Pain (VAS), disability (NDI) | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Simple computer‐based randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of participants? | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of caregivers? | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ <20% drop‐outs? | High risk | Dropout at follow‐up > 20% |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis performed? | High risk | No ITT |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol |
Similarity of baseline characteristics? | Low risk | Baseline similarity |
Co‐interventions avoided? | Low risk | Co‐interventions avoided |
Compliance acceptable ? | Unclear risk | Unclear compliance |
Timing outcome assessment comparable? | Low risk | Timing comparable |