Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD008742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008742.pub2

Ma 2011.

Methods RCT; simple computer‐based randomisation
Participants Daily computer users with a history of computer‐related neck and shoulder discomfort; n = 72
Interventions Biofeedback: portable biofeedback, two hours daily for two weeks; n = 15
Exercise: standardised exercise programme with stretching and strengthening exercises using Thera‐band, 20 minutes four times a day; n = 15
Passive treatment: interferential therapy (20 minutes) and hotpacks 15 minutes two times per week; n = 15
Control: standard educational booklet; n = 15
Intervention period: six weeks, follow‐up at six months
Outcomes Pain (VAS), disability (NDI)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Simple computer‐based randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of participants? Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of caregivers? Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ <20% drop‐outs? High risk Dropout at follow‐up > 20%
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis performed? High risk No ITT
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol
Similarity of baseline characteristics? Low risk Baseline similarity
Co‐interventions avoided? Low risk Co‐interventions avoided
Compliance acceptable ? Unclear risk Unclear compliance
Timing outcome assessment comparable? Low risk Timing comparable