Moore 1996.

Methods	RCT; no info on randomisation procedure
Participants	Recent complaints upper extremity (non‐specific); n = 32 (28 women). Diagnosed as having upper extremity RSI, referred from occupational medicine department
Interventions	HVT (hypnotically induced vasodilatation treatment): relaxation training, biofeedback, hypnosis; n = 15; 45 minutes/wk, six weeks Waiting list controls: n = 17
Outcomes	Comfort (VAS), temperature (hand)
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Low risk	Assigned by following a list of random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Unclear whether allocation was concealed
Blinding of participants?	Unclear risk	Unclear
Blinding of caregivers?	Unclear risk	Unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	Unclear whether outcome assessment was blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ <20% drop‐outs?	Low risk	No dropout mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis performed?	Low risk	ITT analysis assumed
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	No protocol
Similarity of baseline characteristics?	Low risk	Groups similar at baseline
Co‐interventions avoided?	Unclear risk	Unclear whether co‐interventions were avoided
Compliance acceptable ?	Unclear risk	Unclear compliance
Timing outcome assessment comparable?	Low risk	Timing comparable