Omer 2003.
Methods | RCT; no info on randomisation procedure. | |
Participants | Neck and upper extremity complaints (non‐specific); n = 50 (41 women). Computer operators > six hours a day | |
Interventions |
Education + Exercises: education (one hour) + mobilisation, stretching, strengthening and relaxation exercises Education: education one hour Three sessions a week, eight weeks training |
|
Outcomes | Pain (NRS, PDI), tiredness (TS), depression (BDI) | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear randomisation procedure |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear whether allocation was concealed |
Blinding of participants? | Unclear risk | Unclear participant blinding |
Blinding of caregivers? | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear whether outcome assessment was blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ <20% drop‐outs? | Unclear risk | Unclear number of dropouts |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis performed? | Unclear risk | Unclear whether ITT analysis was performed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol |
Similarity of baseline characteristics? | Low risk | Groups similar at baseline |
Co‐interventions avoided? | Unclear risk | Unclear whether co‐interventions were avoided |
Compliance acceptable ? | Unclear risk | Unclear compliance |
Timing outcome assessment comparable? | Unclear risk | Unclear whether timing was comparable |