Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD008742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008742.pub2

Omer 2003.

Methods RCT; no info on randomisation procedure.
Participants Neck and upper extremity complaints (non‐specific); n = 50 (41 women). Computer operators > six hours a day 
Interventions Education + Exercises: education (one hour) + mobilisation, stretching, strengthening and relaxation exercises
Education: education one hour
 
Three sessions a week, eight weeks training 
Outcomes Pain (NRS, PDI), tiredness (TS), depression (BDI)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear randomisation procedure
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear whether allocation was concealed
Blinding of participants? Unclear risk Unclear participant blinding
Blinding of caregivers? Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear whether outcome assessment was blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ <20% drop‐outs? Unclear risk Unclear number of dropouts
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis performed? Unclear risk Unclear whether ITT analysis was performed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol
Similarity of baseline characteristics? Low risk Groups similar at baseline
Co‐interventions avoided? Unclear risk Unclear whether co‐interventions were avoided
Compliance acceptable ? Unclear risk Unclear compliance
Timing outcome assessment comparable? Unclear risk Unclear whether timing was comparable