Rempel 2007.
Methods | RCT; no info on randomisation procedure | |
Participants | Chronic neck and shoulder pain in sewing machine operators; n = 277. Performed sewing machine work for more than 20 hours per week | |
Interventions |
Chair with flat seat: n = 72 Chair with curved seat: n = 100 Control: n = 105 Miscellaneous items provided to all participants were a footrest, a small table‐top storage box for items such as scissors, a side table, a task lamp and reading glasses Four months of follow‐up |
|
Outcomes | Pain, job content (job content questionnaire) | |
Notes | No data available | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details of randomisation method |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details on treatment allocation |
Blinding of participants? | High risk | Participant not blinded |
Blinding of caregivers? | Unclear risk | Unclear whether caregiver was blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participant‐reported outcomes and participant not blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ <20% drop‐outs? | High risk | 209/277 completed the study (25% dropout rate) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis performed? | High risk | No ITT analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol |
Similarity of baseline characteristics? | Unclear risk | Comparison of baseline outcome measures not given |
Co‐interventions avoided? | Unclear risk | Unclear whether co‐interventions were avoided |
Compliance acceptable ? | Unclear risk | Unclear compliance |
Timing outcome assessment comparable? | Low risk | Timing was comparable |