Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD008742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008742.pub2

Rempel 2007.

Methods RCT; no info on randomisation procedure
Participants Chronic neck and shoulder pain in sewing machine operators; n = 277. Performed sewing machine work for more than 20 hours per week 
Interventions Chair with flat seat: n = 72
Chair with curved seat: n = 100
Control: n = 105
Miscellaneous items provided to all participants were a footrest, a small table‐top storage box for items such as scissors, a side table, a task lamp and reading glasses
 
Four months of follow‐up 
Outcomes Pain, job content (job content questionnaire)
Notes No data available
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No details of randomisation method
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details on treatment allocation
Blinding of participants? High risk Participant not blinded
Blinding of caregivers? Unclear risk Unclear whether caregiver was blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participant‐reported outcomes and participant not blinded 
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ <20% drop‐outs? High risk 209/277 completed the study (25% dropout rate)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis performed? High risk No ITT analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol
Similarity of baseline characteristics? Unclear risk Comparison of baseline outcome measures not given
Co‐interventions avoided? Unclear risk Unclear whether co‐interventions were avoided
Compliance acceptable ? Unclear risk Unclear compliance
Timing outcome assessment comparable? Low risk Timing was comparable