Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;2017(11):CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6

Nannini 2000.

Methods Design: randomised controlled trial.
 Method of randomisation: unknown.
 Concealment of allocation: yes.
 Blinding: double‐blind, placebo‐controlled.
 Solutions were pre‐packaged in identical appearing vials.
 Withdrawals/dropouts: 3 participants were enrolled more than once, only the initial visit was used in the analysis.
Participants Location: emergency departments in 4 Argentinian hospitals.
 Participants: 35 patients at least 18 years of age presenting to the emergency department with an acute asthma exacerbation who were able to have PEF measured were enrolled.
 (% predicted PEF: 38 + 18 in treatment group, 38 + 12 in control group).
 Exclusions: current smokers of ≥ 5 pack years, concurrent medical illness, pregnant, breast feeding, oral or parenteral steroids within the previous 7 days.
Interventions Standard of care: all patients received supplemental oxygen. If patient condition worsened patient may receive salbutamol 2.5 mg nebulised at discretion of physician.
 Treatment: 0.5 mL salbutamol (2.5 mg) diluted in 3 mL isotonic MgSO₄ (286 mOsm, 7.5% = 225 mg).
 Control: 0.5 mL salbutamol (2.5 mg) diluted in 3 mL normal saline.
 Administration: jet nebulised using oxygen at 10 L/min via mouthpiece until dry.
Outcomes Measurements made at baseline, 10 minutes after treatment and 20 minutes after treatment.
 Pulmonary functions: primary endpoint : % increase in peak flow = ((change/baseline) × 100).
 Other: peak flow (best of 3 attempts).
 Vital signs: respiratory rate, pulse rate, BP.
 Duration of emergency room care.
 No adverse events reported in either the experimental or control group.
Notes Funding: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Information not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 3 patients were enrolled more than once, only the initial visit was used in the analysis but treatment group not stated.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk There were no significant differences between the groups in changes in BP, heart rate, or respiratory rate at either 10 minutes or 20 minutes.