Skip to main content
. 2001 Feb;125(2):585–594. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.2.585

Table I.

Effect of sh1 or sus1 mutation on post-submergence survival and growth of maize seedlings

Treatment Survival
Grams of Fresh Wt per Seedling
NMa sh1 sus1 NMb
sh1
Root Shoot Root Shoot
%
Aerobic 100 ± 0 95 ± 3 94 ± 5 0.43 ± 0.05 2.09 ± 0.10 0.45 ± 0.04 1.72 ± 0.05
24 h Subb 94 ± 3 88 ± 17 93 ± 9 0.45 ± 0.05 1.35 ± 0.25 0.51 ± 0.05 1.22 ± 0.13
48 h Sub 76 ± 8 80 ± 9 29 ± 19 0.22 ± 0.09 0.68 ± 0.19 0.41 ± 0.06 0.89 ± 0.07
72 h Sub 15 ± 10 72 ± 9 1 ± 1 0.03  ± 0.01c 0.42 ± 0.07 0.13 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0.04

The survival data (means ± se) are 10 seedlings of each genotype (pooled from three different backgrounds) at every time point. Each genotype was tested at least twice. The growth data (means ± se) is shown only for the non-mutant and sh1 genotypes. Under anoxia, no significant difference was observed in the root and shoot growth patterns between non-mutant and sus1 seedlings.

a

 NM, Non-mutant. 

b

 Sub, submerged. 

c

 The 72-h submerged non-mutant seedlings lost their primary roots during post-submergence growth and had only small seminal roots.