Table I.
Effect of sh1 or sus1 mutation on post-submergence survival and growth of maize seedlings
Treatment | Survival
|
Grams of Fresh
Wt per Seedling
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMa | sh1 | sus1 | NMb
|
sh1
|
|||
Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | ||||
% | |||||||
Aerobic | 100 ± 0 | 95 ± 3 | 94 ± 5 | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 2.09 ± 0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.04 | 1.72 ± 0.05 |
24 h Subb | 94 ± 3 | 88 ± 17 | 93 ± 9 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 1.35 ± 0.25 | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 1.22 ± 0.13 |
48 h Sub | 76 ± 8 | 80 ± 9 | 29 ± 19 | 0.22 ± 0.09 | 0.68 ± 0.19 | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 0.89 ± 0.07 |
72 h Sub | 15 ± 10 | 72 ± 9 | 1 ± 1 | 0.03 ± 0.01c | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.04 |
The survival data (means ± se) are 10 seedlings of each genotype (pooled from three different backgrounds) at every time point. Each genotype was tested at least twice. The growth data (means ± se) is shown only for the non-mutant and sh1 genotypes. Under anoxia, no significant difference was observed in the root and shoot growth patterns between non-mutant and sus1 seedlings.
NM, Non-mutant.
Sub, submerged.
The 72-h submerged non-mutant seedlings lost their primary roots during post-submergence growth and had only small seminal roots.