Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 9;2017(11):CD011770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011770.pub2

Comparison 18. Duration of sensory block: perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Duration of sensory block 9 720 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [1.68, 4.58]
2 Duration of sensory block additive versus no additive subgroups 9 720 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [1.68, 4.58]
2.1 Additive 3 331 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.94 [2.66, 5.21]
2.2 No additive 6 389 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.67 [0.00, 5.34]
3 Duration sensory block high‐dose versus low‐dose dexamethasone subgroups 9 720 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [1.68, 4.58]
3.1 High‐dose dexamethasone 6 508 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.35 [0.04, 4.66]
3.2 Low‐dose dexamethasone 3 212 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 4.14 [2.48, 5.81]
4 Duration sensory block high/unclear versus low risk of bias subgroups 9 720 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [1.68, 4.58]
4.1 High/unclear risk of bias 3 162 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 4.67 [2.29, 7.04]
4.2 Low risk of bias 6 558 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.30 [0.23, 4.37]