Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 9;2017(11):CD011770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011770.pub2

Comparison 19. Duration of motor block: perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Duration of motor block 5 421 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [0.99, 5.27]
2 Duration of motor block: additive versus no additive subgroups 5 340 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.75 [0.32, 5.19]
2.1 Additive 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 4.0 [‐0.03, 8.03]
2.2 No additive 4 290 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.39 [‐0.58, 5.37]
3 Duration of motor block: high‐ versus low‐dose dexamethasone subgroups 5 421 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [0.99, 5.27]
3.1 High‐dose dexamethasone 4 381 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.47 [‐0.25, 5.19]
3.2 Low‐dose dexamethasone 1 40 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.0 [2.53, 7.47]
4 Duration of motor block: high/unclear versus low risk of bias subgroups 5 421 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [0.99, 5.27]
4.1 HIgh/unclear risk of bias 1 40 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.0 [2.53, 7.47]
4.2 Low risk of bias 4 381 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.47 [‐0.25, 5.19]