Pergament 2014.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Study design: blinded, prospective cohort study. Participants: pregnant women from a population with mixed risk of fetal aneuploidy presenting for aneuploidy screening (51% high risk and 49% low risk). Inclusion criteria: women were 18 years of age or older with a singleton pregnancy of at least 7 weeks of gestation and signed an informed consent. Exclusion criteria: women with confirmed sex chromosome abnormality (47,XXX, XXY, XYY), confirmed triploidy, confirmed fetal mosaicism or multifetal pregnancy or egg donor. | ||
Patient characteristics and setting | Number enrolled: 1064 pregnant women. Number available for 2 x 2 table: 963 pregnant women for T21, 964 for T18 and 45,X and 965 for T13 (subgroup of 91%). Setting: 35 centres. Prenatal care centres worldwide in Czech Republic, Japan, USA, Ireland and Spain. Recruitment period: not reported. Ethnicity: not reported. Mean gestational age (± SD; range): 17.0 (± 4.1; 7.6 to 40.6) weeks. Median gestational age: 14.3 weeks. Mean maternal age (± SD; range): 30.3 (± 7.4; 18 to 47) years. Median maternal age: 30.0 years. Relevant tests carried out prior to index test: ultrasonography (nuchal translucency measurement) or biochemical screening or both. Language of the study: English. | ||
Index tests | gNIPT by TMPS (SNP‐based method) on Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx or HiSeq sequencers, 19,488‐plex targeted PCR with NATUS algorithm. Range fetal fraction DNA: 2% to 50%. Blood samples for gNIPT were collected before (93%) or 4 days or later after (7%) reference standard. Cutpoint: not reported. Commercial test: Natera's prenatal test. |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Target conditions: T21, T18, T13 and 45,X. Reference standards: fetal karyotype with confirmatory fluorescence in situ hybridisation or cytogenetic karyotype analysis or by genetic testing of cord blood, buccal sample, saliva, or products of conception, post‐natal or post‐live birth follow‐up. | ||
Flow and timing | Blood samples for gNIPT were obtained prior (93%) or after (7%) to the invasive procedure (reference standard).
gNIPT was a second‐tier test. 13/1064 samples excluded for other aneuploidies, including 6 cases with triploidy, 3 fetal mosaics, 2 cases with 47,XXY, 1 case with 47,XXX and 1 case with 47,XYY. 85/1051 samples failed quality control (no gNIPT result) including 64 low fetal fraction DNA, 12 low DNA, 6 contaminations, 2 loss of heterozygosity and 1 poor model fit. Between 1 to 3 samples did not passed quality control for all 5 chromosomes. No repeated test reported. |
||
Comparative | |||
Aim to study | To estimate performance of a single nucleotide polymorphism–based gNIPT (TMPS) for fetal aneuploidy in high‐risk and low‐risk populations on single venipuncture. | ||
Funding source or sponsor of the study | Study funded by Natera, Inc. and a grant from the National Institute of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (4R44HD062114‐02). The majority of the authors are employees of Natera, Inc. and hold stock or options to hold stock in the company. | ||
Informations about the authors contacted | Author was contacted on: 22 June 2016. No reply received from the author. | ||
Notes | |||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Unclear | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | Yes | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | No | ||
High | High | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test TMPS | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Yes | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all analysed patients receive the reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | No | ||
High |