Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;2017(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2

3. Findings from previous analyses for incisional hernia.

  Absorbable versus non‐absorbable Mass versus layered Continuous versus interrupted closure Slow versus fast absorbable
Hodgson 2000 Favours non‐absorbable sutures (13 trials) N/A Favours continuous closure (6 trials) N/A
Rucinski 2001 Favours non‐absorbable sutures over braided absorbable (unclear number of trials) N/A N/A N/A
Sajid 2011 No difference (8 trials) N/A N/A N/A
Van't Riet 2002 No difference between slow absorbable and non‐absorbable sutures (5 trials) N/A No difference (7 trials) Favours slow absorbable sutures (1 trial)
Weiland 1998 Favours non‐absorbable sutures (7 studies) Favours layered closure (9 studies) Favours continuous closure (8 trials) N/A