Siddique 2015.
Methods |
RCT Methods to control for contributory patient factors: none |
|
Participants |
Age: Group 1 (mean): 36 Group 2 (mean): 36 Gender: not reported Types of incisions: all participants had a midline incision Types of surgery: both elective and emergent (proportions not reported) Contamination classification of included participants: not described Preoperative antibiotic use: "all patients received antibiotics against gram negative and anaerobic organisms" Prognostic patient factors: not reported in detail Inclusion criteria: patients undergoing a midline laparotomy, age > 15, ASA 1 & 2 Exclusion criteria: patients who developed a wound infection |
|
Interventions |
Comparisons reported: Group 1: Sutures: PDS (monofilament, slowly absorbable) Suture technique: continuous Closure method: mass Group 2: Sutures: polypropylene (monofilament, non‐absorbable) Suture technique: continuous Closure method: mass Characteristics of surgeons: not reported |
|
Outcomes | Dehiscence: not defined, diagnosed within 7 days of surgery | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants accounted for, no losses to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | There was no evidence of selective reporting |
Other bias | High risk | Participants were excluded if they developed a wound infection |