Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;2017(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2

Siddique 2015.

Methods RCT
Methods to control for contributory patient factors: none
Participants Age:
Group 1 (mean): 36
Group 2 (mean): 36
Gender: not reported
Types of incisions: all participants had a midline incision
Types of surgery: both elective and emergent (proportions not reported)
Contamination classification of included participants: not described
Preoperative antibiotic use: "all patients received antibiotics against gram negative and anaerobic organisms"
Prognostic patient factors: not reported in detail
Inclusion criteria: patients undergoing a midline laparotomy, age > 15, ASA 1 & 2
Exclusion criteria: patients who developed a wound infection
Interventions Comparisons reported:
Group 1:
 Sutures: PDS (monofilament, slowly absorbable)
 Suture technique: continuous
 Closure method: mass
Group 2:
 Sutures: polypropylene (monofilament, non‐absorbable)
 Suture technique: continuous
 Closure method: mass
Characteristics of surgeons: not reported
Outcomes Dehiscence: not defined, diagnosed within 7 days of surgery
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants accounted for, no losses to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk There was no evidence of selective reporting
Other bias High risk Participants were excluded if they developed a wound infection