Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 28;2017(12):CD008072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008072.pub2

Comparison 3. Atraumatic restorative treatment using resin‐modified glass ionomer cement (RM‐GIC) versus conventional treatment using RM‐GIC.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Restoration failure ‐ permanent teeth ‐ longest follow‐up 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Secondary caries 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only