Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 15;2016(4):CD011203. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011203.pub2

Comparison 1. Alemtuzumab 12 mg versus interferon beta‐1a.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Relapse‐free survival 2   Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 24‐month analysis 2   Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.50 [0.41, 0.60]
2 Sustained disease progression‐free survival 3   Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 24‐month analysis 2   Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.44, 0.87]
2.2 36‐month analysis 1   Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.25 [0.11, 0.57]
3 Number of participants with at least one adverse event 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 24‐month analysis 2 1248 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.04 [1.01, 1.06]
3.2 36‐month analysis 1 224 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.98, 1.02]
4 Change in EDSS score 3   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 24‐month analysis 2 1199 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.20 [‐0.60, 0.20]
4.2 36‐month analysis 1 223 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.7 [‐1.04, ‐0.36]
5 Number of participants with new or enlarging T2‐hyperintense lesions 2 1238 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.59, 0.91]
6 Number of dropouts 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6.1 24‐months analysis 2 1248 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.31 [0.23, 0.41]
6.2 36‐months analysis 1 224 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.81 [0.57, 1.14]