Rosado 2010.
Methods | Design: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group, single‐centre clinical trial Randomisation ratio: not stated |
|
Participants | Participants: 40 participants recruited, 40 analysed (cinnamon = 20, placebo = 20). Mean age (cinnamon = 53.9 ± 9.2 years, placebo = 54.9 ± 10.8 years). Sex (male/female) (cinnamon = 10/10, placebo = 9/11). Duration of diabetes (cinnamon = 5.4 ± 5.9 years, placebo = 4.9 ± 4.8 years) Inclusion criteria: type 2 diabetes mellitus; 30 to 70 years of age; taking metformin for glucose control for at least 3 months (at a daily dose of at least 1000 mg); and FBGL 7.0 to 16.7 mmol/L or HbA1c > 7% Exclusion criteria: pregnancy; known allergy to cinnamon; history of peptic ulceration; BMI > 35 kg/m2; receiving tetracycline therapy; receiving insulin therapy Diagnostic criteria: American Diabetes Association (2003) criteria Co‐morbidities: hyperlipidaemia (70%) Co‐medications: metformin, hypolipidaemic agents, and any other prescribed medications (other than excluded medications) | |
Interventions | Number of study centres: 1
Country/location: Honolulu, Hawaii, US
Setting: medical centre outpatient clinics
Intervention (route, total dose/day, frequency): oral, cinnamon 250 mg (water‐soluble extract of C. burmanii; Cinnulin PF®) capsule, twice a day Control (route, total dose/day, frequency): oral, 250 mg bran cereal (control) capsule, twice a day Treatment before study: not stated Titration period: not applicable |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome(s) (as stated in the publication): not stated Secondary outcomes (as stated in the publication): not stated Additional/other outcomes: HbA1c; FBGL, PPG, total cholesterol; triglycerides; low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol |
|
Study details | Duration of intervention: 40 days (5.7 weeks) Duration of follow‐up: 20 days Run‐in period: not applicable | |
Publication details | Language of publication: English Non‐commercial funding Publication status: dissertation |
|
Stated aim of study | To determine whether cinnamon improves blood glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in persons with type‐2 diabetes | |
Notes | ‐ | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomized"; "subjects were assigned a sequential number..(and)...a sequential number...was assigned to each capsule container based on the computer‐generated (allocation) table...pharmacy personnel randomized the study capsule containers to treatment or control" Comment: probably done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The investigative team did not know the capsule allocation table results"; "The computer‐generated allocation was maintained by...Pharmacy personnel in a sealed envelope" Comment: probably done |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "double‐blind"; "(capsulated) cinnamon...for the treatment group and identical capsules...for the control group" Comment: probably done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | ITT not mentioned, though it appeared that all randomised participants were included in the analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | All primary outcomes listed were reported, though no study protocol was published or lodged |
Other bias | Unclear risk | 3 participants withdrew from the study ‐ the reasons for withdrawal differed between groups. Information on enrolments and exclusions was missing |