Summary of findings for the main comparison. LOD compared to medical interventions for symptom relief in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
LOD compared to medical interventions for symptom relief in women with polycystic ovary syndrome | ||||||
Patient or population: Women with symptoms of PCOS Setting: Clinic or hospital Intervention: Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) Comparison: medical interventions | ||||||
Outcomes | Relative effect (95% CI) | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | What happens | ||
Without LOD | With LOD | Difference | ||||
Menstrual regularity at 6 months LOD vs metformin N of participants: 236 (2 RCTs) LOD vs metformin + clomiphene N of participants: 332 (2 RCTs) LOD vs gonadotropins N of participants: 35 (1 RCT) LOD vs letrozole N of participants: 260 (1 RCT) LOD vs metformin + letrozole N of participants: 146 (1 RCT) |
Findings inconsistent and data unsuitable for pooling | Not calculable | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOW 1, 2, 3 | |||
OR 1.02 (0.64 to 1.64) | 70.6% | 71.0% (60.5 to 79.7) | 0.4% more (10 fewer to 9.2 more) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 1, 3 | ||
OR 19.20 (3.17 to 116.45) | 11.1% | 70.6% (28.4 to 93.6) | 59.5% more (17.3 more to 82.5 more) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 1, 3 | ||
OR 1.08 (0.64 to 1.84) | 68.8% | 70.4% (58.5 to 80.2) | 1.6% more (10.3 fewer to 11.4 more) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 1, 3 | ||
OR 0.95 (0.49 to 1.81) | 52.1% | 50.8% (34.7 to 66.3) | 1.3% fewer (17.3 fewer to 14.2 more) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 1, 3 | ||
Improvement in androgenic symptoms at 6 months (hirsutism/acne) ‐ LOD vs metformin N of participants: 126 (1 RCT) | OR 1.00 (0.42 to 2.37) | 79.4% | 79.4% (61.8 to 90.1) | 0.0% fewer (17.6 fewer to 10.7 more) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 1, 3 | |
Improvement in androgenic symptoms at 6 months (hirsutism/acne) ‐ LOD vs gonadotrophins N of participants: 50 (1 RCT) | Acne: OR 3.20 (0.33 to 30.94) Hirsutism: OR 2.31, (0.22 to 23.89) |
See comments | ⊕⊝⊝⊝VERY LOW 1, 4 | Acne: 4/29 without LOD, 1/21 with LOD Hirsutism: 3/29 without LOD, 1/21 with LOD |
||
Harms: GI Upset at 6 months ‐ LOD vs metformin + clomiphene
N of participants: 332 (2 RCTs) Harms: OHSS rates at 6 months ‐ LOD vs gonadotrophins N of participants: 33 (1 RCT) |
OR 0.05 (0.01 to 0.36) | 10.4% | 0.6% (0.1 to 4.0) | 9.9% fewer (10.3 fewer to 6.4 fewer) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 1 | |
OR 0.08 (0.00 to 1.61) | 25.0% | 2.6% (0.0 to 34.9) | 22.4% fewer (25 fewer to 9.9 more) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 1, 3 | ||
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the mean risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; OHSS: ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect |
1Downgraded one level for serious risk of bias: Included studies not double‐blinded, and in some cases methods of randomization unclear. 2Downgraded two levels for very serious and unexplained heterogeneity: I2 = 85%, direction of effect inconsistent 3Downgraded one level for serious imprecision. 4Downgraded two levels for very serious imprecision: Broad confidence interval, very few events.