Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 10;2017(11):CD009526. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009526.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison. LOD compared to medical interventions for symptom relief in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

LOD compared to medical interventions for symptom relief in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Patient or population: Women with symptoms of PCOS
 Setting: Clinic or hospital
 Intervention: Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD)
 Comparison: medical interventions
Outcomes Relative effect
 (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) What happens
Without LOD With LOD Difference
Menstrual regularity at 6 months
LOD vs metformin
 N of participants: 236 (2 RCTs)
LOD vs metformin + clomiphene
 N of participants: 332 (2 RCTs)
LOD vs gonadotropins
 N of participants: 35 (1 RCT)
LOD vs letrozole
 N of participants: 260 (1 RCT)
LOD vs metformin + letrozole
 N of participants: 146 (1 RCT)
Findings inconsistent and data unsuitable for pooling Not calculable ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW 1, 2, 3  
OR 1.02
 (0.64 to 1.64) 70.6% 71.0%
 (60.5 to 79.7) 0.4% more
 (10 fewer to 9.2 more) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 3  
OR 19.20
 (3.17 to 116.45) 11.1% 70.6%
 (28.4 to 93.6) 59.5% more
 (17.3 more to 82.5 more) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 3  
OR 1.08
 (0.64 to 1.84) 68.8% 70.4%
 (58.5 to 80.2) 1.6% more
 (10.3 fewer to 11.4 more) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 3  
OR 0.95
 (0.49 to 1.81) 52.1% 50.8%
 (34.7 to 66.3) 1.3% fewer
 (17.3 fewer to 14.2 more) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 3  
Improvement in androgenic symptoms at 6 months (hirsutism/acne) ‐ LOD vs metformin
 N of participants: 126
 (1 RCT) OR 1.00
 (0.42 to 2.37) 79.4% 79.4%
 (61.8 to 90.1) 0.0% fewer
 (17.6 fewer to 10.7 more) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 3  
Improvement in androgenic symptoms at 6 months (hirsutism/acne) ‐ LOD vs gonadotrophins
 N of participants: 50 (1 RCT) Acne: OR 3.20 (0.33 to 30.94)
Hirsutism: OR 2.31, (0.22 to 23.89)
See comments ⊕⊝⊝⊝VERY LOW 1, 4 Acne: 4/29 without LOD, 1/21 with LOD
Hirsutism: 3/29 without LOD, 1/21 with LOD
Harms: GI Upset at 6 months ‐ LOD vs metformin + clomiphene
 N of participants: 332 (2 RCTs)
Harms: OHSS rates at 6 months ‐ LOD vs gonadotrophins
 N of participants: 33 (1 RCT)
OR 0.05
 (0.01 to 0.36) 10.4% 0.6%
 (0.1 to 4.0) 9.9% fewer
 (10.3 fewer to 6.4 fewer) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1  
OR 0.08
 (0.00 to 1.61) 25.0% 2.6%
 (0.0 to 34.9) 22.4% fewer
 (25 fewer to 9.9 more) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 3  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the mean risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; OHSS: ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1Downgraded one level for serious risk of bias: Included studies not double‐blinded, and in some cases methods of randomization unclear.
 2Downgraded two levels for very serious and unexplained heterogeneity: I2 = 85%, direction of effect inconsistent
 3Downgraded one level for serious imprecision.
 4Downgraded two levels for very serious imprecision: Broad confidence interval, very few events.