Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 18;2012(1):CD008101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008101.pub2

Comparison 4. Adults ‐ Retrospective CGM.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Change in HbA1c 2   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Follow up 3 months 2   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Severe hypoglycaemia 1   Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Follow up 3 months 1   Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 CGM‐derived hypoglycaemia 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 Follow up 3 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 CGM‐derived hyperglycaemia 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 Follow up 3 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]