Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006297.pub2

De Leeuw 2005.

Methods DURATION OF INTERVENTION: 
 12 months. 
 DURATION OF FOLLOW‐UP: 
 N/A 
 RUN‐IN PERIOD: 
 ? weeks. 
 LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: 
 English.
Participants WHO PARTCIPATED: 
 Type 1 diabetic adult patients. 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 Patients initiated had a history of type 1 diabetes for over 1 year and had used basal‐bolus therapy for at least 2 months prior to enrolment. 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 Proliferative retinopathy, impaired hepatic or renal function, severe cardiac problems, uncontrolled hypertension, recurrent major hypoglycaemia or allergy to insulin. Pregnant or breast‐feeding women were also excluded 
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA: 
 Not defined
Interventions NUMBER OF STUDY CENTRES: 
 42 
 SETTING: 
 Out‐patient. 
 INTERVENTION (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): 
 Detemir (BID) + Aspart 
 CONTROL (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): 
 NPH (BID) + Aspart 
 TREATMENT BEFORE STUDY: 
 ? 
 TITRATION PERIOD: 
 ?
Outcomes PRIMARY OUTCOME(S): 
 ? 
 SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 
 Glycosylated haemoglobin, FPG and 9‐point BG profiles, weight gain, hypoglycaemia.
Notes STATED AIM OF STUDY: 
 To assess the relative safety and efficacy over a 1‐year period of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin, with IAsp as mealtime insulin.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear