Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006297.pub2

Kolendorf 2006.

Methods DURATION OF INTERVENTION: 
 16 weeks. 
 DURATION OF FOLLOW‐UP: 
 N/A 
 RUN‐IN PERIOD: 
 2 weeks. 
 LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: 
 English.
Participants WHO PARTCIPATED: 
 Type 1 diabetic adult patients. 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 Age < 18 years with a history of Type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year, treated with a basal‐bolus insulin regimen for 
 4 months with basal insulin (once, twice or three times daily) in combination with mealtime IAsp or insulin lispro three to four times daily, able and willing to perform self‐measured plasma glucose (SMPG). Only C‐peptide‐negative persons with glycosylated haemoglobin < 9%, body mass index 35 kg/m2, total daily insulin dose 1.4 IU/kg per day and a basal insulin requirement 30% of the total daily insulin dose were included. 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 Individuals with significant medical disorders were excluded, as were those with hypoglycaemic unawareness, recurrent major hypoglycaemia, allergy to insulin and pregnant or breast‐feeding women. 
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA: 
 Not defined
Interventions NUMBER OF STUDY CENTRES: 
 11. 
 SETTING: 
 Out‐patient. 
 INTERVENTION (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): 
 Detemir (BID) + Aspart 
 CONTROL (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): 
 NPH (BID) + Aspart 
 TREATMENT BEFORE STUDY: 
 ? 
 TITRATION PERIOD:
Outcomes PRIMARY OUTCOME(S): 
 Incidence of total self‐recorded hypoglycaemic episodes with 
 detemir relative to NPH during the last 10 weeks of each 
 treatment period. 
 SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 
 Glycosylated haemoglobin, day‐to‐day within‐person variation in SMPG, weight.
Notes STATED AIM OF STUDY: 
 To establish whether basal‐bolus treatment with detemir in combination with IAsp was associated with lower risks of hypoglycaemia compared with treatment with NPH plus IAsp in individuals with Type 1 diabetes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear