Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006297.pub2

Raskin 2000.

Methods DURATION OF INTERVENTION: 
 16 weeks. 
 DURATION OF FOLLOW‐UP: 
 N/A 
 RUN‐IN PERIOD: 
 1 to 4 weeks. 
 LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: 
 English.
Participants WHO PARTCIPATED: 
 Type 1 diabetic adult patients. 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 Eligible patients had type 1 diabetes, were 18‐80 years of age, and had been receiving treatment with NPH insulin for at least 1 year and insulin lispro for at least 3 months. Patients had to have a serum C‐peptide level < 9 mg/dl (0.5 mmol/L) in the presence of a blood glucose level _99.0 mg/dl (5.5 mmol/L) and a GHb value < 12.0%. 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 Patients with hepatic or renal impairment, those who were pregnant or breast feeding, and those who had received treatment with any glucose‐lowering drug other than insulin within 4 weeks of the study. 
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA: 
 Not defined
Interventions NUMBER OF STUDY CENTRES: 
 60. 
 SETTING: 
 Out‐patient. 
 INTERVENTION (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): 
 Glargine (QD) + lispro 
 CONTROL (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): 
 NPH (QD/BID) + lispro 
 TREATMENT BEFORE STUDY: 
 NPH + lispro 
 TITRATION PERIOD:
Outcomes PRIMARY OUTCOME(S): 
 ? 
 SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 
 Glycosylated haemoglobin, FBG, FPG, hypoglycaemia.
Notes STATED AIM OF STUDY: 
 We compared the effects of insulin glargine once a day at bedtime and NPH insulin once or twice a day as basal insulin treatment for 16 weeks in patients with type 1 diabetes who were currently receiving NPH insulin for basal treatment and preprandial insulin lispro for postprandial glycemic control.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear