Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006297.pub2

Zinman 1999.

Methods DURATION OF INTERVENTION: 
 1 year. 
 DURATION OF FOLLOW‐UP: 
 N/A 
 RUN‐IN PERIOD: 
 2 weeks. 
 LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: 
 English.
Participants WHO PARTCIPATED: 
 Type 1 diabetic adult patients. 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 Patients with a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 Patients with severe retinopathy or neuropathy and patients who had experienced more than two severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past year 
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA: 
 Not defined
Interventions NUMBER OF STUDY CENTRES: 
 ? 
 SETTING: 
 Out‐patient + inpatient. 
 INTERVENTION (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): 
 Ultralente (QD) + lispro. 
 CONTROL (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): 
 NPH (QD) + lispro. 
 TREATMENT BEFORE STUDY: 
 ? 
 TITRATION PERIOD: 
 ?
Outcomes PRIMARY OUTCOME(S): 
 ? 
 SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 
 Eight point blood glucose profile, glycosylated haemoglobin, hypoglycemia, weight, 24‐h free plasma insulin.
Notes STATED AIM OF STUDY: 
 To compare human ultralente (UL) insulin with human NPH insulin as basal insulin replacement in patients who use insulin lispro before meals.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear