Clonazepam 1999, CHN.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Allocation: randomised. Blinding: double blind. Design: not stated. Duration: 24 hours. Setting: inpatients, Chinese hospital. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (n = 19), mood disorder (n = 19), schizoaffective psychosis (n = 6), epileptic mental disorder (n = 1), alcohol‐induced psychosis (n = 1) from Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders (CCMD‐2‐R). n = 46. Age: mean 32 years. Gender: 32 men, 14 women. Ethnicity: not stated. Consent: not stated. History: not stated. Inclusion criteria: aggressive people with mental illness. Exclusion criteria: not stated. |
|
Interventions | Benzodiazepines vs antipsychotics. 1. Clonazepam 2 mg IM (n = 22). 2. Haloperidol 10 mg IM (n = 24). |
|
Outcomes | Behaviour: mean endpoint (OAS). Mental state: mean endpoint score (BPRS). Adverse effects/events: EPS, tremor, high heart rate. |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Subject randomised" ‐ no further description. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. Rating scales: unclear who administered the rating scales. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Follow‐up: 100%. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All measured outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Funding: not stated. Unsure whether there was potential bias. |