Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 13;2017(11):CD006437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006437.pub3

Shalaby 2001.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants Number of participants: 150
Number of centres: 2
Mean age: 10 years
Number of males: 67
Number of females: 83
Inclusion criteria: diagnosis of acute appendicitis from October 1997 to October 1999
Exclusion criteria: NS
Interventions Intervention arm 1: Endo GIA (Ethicon Endo‐Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) stapler
Intervention arm 2: extracorporeal laparoscopically assisted appendectomy
Control arm: ligature (Endoloop)
Antibiotic use: 50 mg/kg ceftriaxone preoperatively, then 1 or 2 doses postoperatively. Metronidazole 25 mg/kg to those with suppurative and gangrenous appendicitis
Outcomes Primary outcome measures: residual abscess, wound infection, bleeding, and intestinal obstruction
Secondary outcome measures: cost, operative time, and hospital stay
Notes Level of seniority of operating surgeon not specified
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomly assigned to one of the groups using a table of random numbers. The randomisation procedure was not restricted".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Information insufficient to allow judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk It is unclear whether participants were aware of the method used. Personnel would likely be aware from operative records.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Information insufficient to allow judgement, but personnel would likely be aware from operative records.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No a priori publication of intended outcomes was identified from either a published trial protocol or trial registration.
Other bias Low risk This study appears to be free of other sources of bias.