Thunander 2010.
Methods |
RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (RCT): Patient preference randomised controlled trial (incomplete randomisation as patients refusing insulin were not analysed within the insulin arm as per ITT but were considered within the tablet arm). RANDOMISATION RATIO: randomised into two groups in blocks of eight NON‐INFERIORITY DESIGN: no EQUIVALENCE DESIGN: no ETHICS APPROVAL OBTAINED: yes PATIENT CONSENT OBTAINED: yes BLINDING OF PATIENT (P), EDUCATOR (E), RESEARCHER (R): P = no, E = no, R = no ANALYSIS BY INTENTION TO TREAT: reported to use intention to treat analysis but not evidence this was performed POWER CALCULATION: no |
|
Participants |
WHO PARTCIPATED: SEX (female% / male%): Conventional treatment group; 42% F (7/17), 58.8% M (10/17), insulin group 55% F(11/20), 45% M (9/20) AGE (mean years (SD)): Conventional treatment group = 57.8 ± 15.1, Insulin group = 51.0 ± 14.3 ETHNIC GROUPS (%): not stated DURATION OF DISEASE (median months (range)):Conventional treatment group = 5.0 [range 1 to 22], Insulin group = 6.0 [range: 1.5 to 24] INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) diagnosis of diabetes (2) aged >30 yrs (3) not insulin requiring at diagnosis (3) GAD antibodies or ICA antibodies. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) mental conditions or severe physical illness. DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA: Diagnosed with diabetes with at least one of GADA or ICA CO‐MORBIDITIES:Not given CO‐MEDICATIONS: Not given NUMBER: Conventional treatment group 17, Insulin 20 LOSS TO FOLLOW‐UP:Conventional treatment group = 2 out of 17 lost at 36 months, Insulin group = 2 out of 20 lost at 36 months. |
|
Interventions |
NUMBER OF STUDY CENTRES:2 COUNTRY/ LOCATION: Sweden SETTING: out‐patient INTERVENTION (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): subcutaneous insulin therapy starting with 2‐6 units intermediate‐acting insulin at night. CONTROL (ROUTE, TOTAL DOSE/DAY, FREQUENCY): diet +/‐ oral hypoglycaemic agents (metformin and or SU) TREATMENT BEFORE STUDY:None TITRATION PERIOD: None. |
|
Outcomes |
PRIMARY OUTCOME(S) (as stated in the publication):Not stated but objectives states "to investigate the effect of early insulin treatment of LADA patients on residual beta‐cell function compared to a group initially treated with diet and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents" SECONDARY OUTCOMES (as stated in the publication):Not stated but objectives states "to investigate the effect of early insulin treatment of LADA patients on metabolic control compared to a group initially treated with diet and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents" ADDITIONAL OUTCOMES: Collected at baseline and 12 months, 24 months and 36 months 1.HbA1c, 2. Glucagon‐stimulated C‐peptide and changes in C‐peptide were measured. |
|
Study details |
DURATION OF INTERVENTION:36 months DURATION OF FOLLOW‐UP: 36 months RUN‐IN PERIOD:None |
|
Publication details |
LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: English COMMERCIAL FUNDING: no NON‐COMMERCIAL FUNDING: yes PUBLICATION STATUS (PEER REVIEW JOURNAL): yes PUBLICATION STATUS (JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT): no PUBLICATION STATUS (ABSTRACT): full paper |
|
Stated aim for study | Quote "To investigate the effect of early insulin treatment of LADA patients, during three years, on residual beta‐cell function and metabolic control, compared to a group initially treated with diet and/or hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) " | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Pre‐prepared envelopes were used which is a less robust method compared to phone or Internet allocation. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | There was no evidence that the analyst was blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Intention to treat was reported but no evidence that it was used. i.e. last result carried forward for those lost to follow‐up, analysis within the insulin arm of those randomised to insulin but choosing to be treated with conventional medication. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No problems identified |
Other bias | Low risk | No problems identified |