Comparison 19. NEURODYNAMIC VS CARPAL BONE MOBILISATION.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Symptoms	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
1.1 After 3 weeks of treatment	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Improved pain	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
2.1 After 3 weeks of treatment	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Improved hand function	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
3.1 After 3 weeks of treatment	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Active wrist flexion (degrees)	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
4.1 After 3 weeks of treatment	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Active wrist extension (degrees)	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
5.1 After 3 weeks of treatment	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Improvement in upper limb tension test (ULTT2a)	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
6.1 After 3 weeks of treatment	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7 Need for surgical release	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
7.1 After 3 weeks of treatment	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]