Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 20;2003(1):CD003219. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003219

Pal 1988.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
Blinded subjects and assessor
Quality score: B
 Selection bias ‐ in part 
 Performance bias ‐ no
 Attrition bias ‐ in part
 Detection bias ‐ in part 
 BIAS RATING = MODERATE
Quality of diagnostic criteria = A
Participants Total n = 48 randomised
 Intervention group n = 23 (41 hands)
 Control group n = 25 (40 hands)
5 males; 43 females
Mean ± sd age: 
 Intervention 41 ± 13 yrs
 Control 53 ± 13 yrs
Inclusion criteria:
 1. CTS confirmed with electrodiagnostic testing
Exclusion criteria:
 1. Patients with recognised causes of CTS: rheumatoid arthritis, other inflammatory arthropathies, thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, acromegaly, amyloid disease
 2. Pregnancy
 3. Recent weight gain
 4. Trauma involving the wrist
 5. Patients already treated with diuretics
 6. Known hypersensitivity to bendrofluazide or other thiazides
Interventions Intervention: Diuretic treatment with bendrofluazide, 5mg daily for 4 weeks
Placebo: Placebo tablet for 4 weeks
Outcomes Outcome assessed at 4 weeks and 6 months** (5 months following end of treatment)
1. Symptom improvement (rated on ordinal scale 0‐5, 0=no improvement at all, 5=full recovery)
 2. Nerve conduction* (median motor and sensory distal latencies)
Notes Attempts to clarify allocation method with authors were unsuccessful
*Note. Nerve conduction data was not entered into RevMan as mean values were published without data for variability (sd). Differences between groups for motor and sensory latencies could not be calculated. Attempts to obtain raw data from authors were unsuccessful
**Outcome at 6 months was only assessed for patients who showed improvement at 4 weeks
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear