Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD008927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008927.pub2

Comparison 3. Interleukin‐2 receptor antagonist versus no induction.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Daclizumab 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Acute rejection 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Daclizumab 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Pneumonia 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 Daclizumab 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 CMV infection 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 Daclizumab 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.1 Daclizumab 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]