Methods |
Study design: parallel RCT
Language: English
Type of publication: Journal article
Overall quality assessment: High risk of bias
|
Participants |
Setting: single centre, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Country: USA
Number: ATG (34); muromonab‐CD3 (30)
Sex (M/F): ATG (16/18); muromonab‐CD3 (14/16)
Mean age ± SD years: ATG (51 ± 11); muromonab‐CD3 (51 ± 12)
Inclusion criteria: all patients who met standard criteria for lung transplantation and were classified as NYHA Class IV at transplantation
-
Indication (No., %)
COPD: ATG (15, 44%); muromonab‐CD3 (11, 38%)
Pulmonary fibrosis: ATG (5, 15%); muromonab‐CD3 (8, 28%)
Cystic fibrosis: ATG (1, 3%); muromonab‐CD3 (2, 7%)
Sarcoidosis: ATG (2, 6%); muromonab‐CD3 (1, 3%)
Pulmonary hypertension: ATG (6, 18%); muromonab‐CD3 (1, 3%)
Bronchiectasis: ATG (0, 0%); muromonab‐CD3 (1, 3%)
Scleroderma: ATG (4, 12%); muromonab‐CD3 (0, 0%)
Other: ATG (1, 3%); muromonab‐CD3 (1, 3%)
-
Transplant procedure (No., %)
Single lung: ATG (27, 79%); muromonab‐CD3 (17, 57%)
Double lung: ATG (7, 21%); muromonab‐CD3 (13, 43%)
All patients with cystic fibrosis or severe pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure > 50 mm Hg) preferentially received bilateral lung transplantation. All other patients had single lung transplants
|
Interventions |
Treatment group 1
Induction was initiated based on the schema outlined for each study group. The first doses of muromonab‐CD3 and ATG were given within 24 hours of surgery, and then both drugs were continued daily for 7 consecutive days post‐transplant. Muromonab‐CD3 5 mg/d was given initially for patients > 80 kg and 2.5 mg/d for patients < 80 kg. It was then adjusted daily thereafter to maintain a peripheral CD3 count of 5% of the total lymphocyte count or 50 cells/mm³.
Treatment group 2
Concomitant immunosuppressive treatment
Follow‐up: 2 years |
Outcomes |
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Pair‐wise randomisation, not further specified |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
No blinding reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
No blinding reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
No patients were lost to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
No protocol was available, but the study reported on mortality, rejection, infection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, PTLD and adverse events |
Other bias |
Low risk |
Study appears to be free of other bias components |