Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD008927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008927.pub2

Brock 2001.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Language: English

  • Type of publication: Journal article

  • Overall quality assessment: High risk of bias

Participants
  • Setting: single centre, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

  • Country: USA

  • Number: ATG (34); muromonab‐CD3 (30)

  • Sex (M/F): ATG (16/18); muromonab‐CD3 (14/16)

  • Mean age ± SD years: ATG (51 ± 11); muromonab‐CD3 (51 ± 12)

  • Inclusion criteria: all patients who met standard criteria for lung transplantation and were classified as NYHA Class IV at transplantation

  • Indication (No., %)

    • COPD: ATG (15, 44%); muromonab‐CD3 (11, 38%)

    • Pulmonary fibrosis: ATG (5, 15%); muromonab‐CD3 (8, 28%)

    • Cystic fibrosis: ATG (1, 3%); muromonab‐CD3 (2, 7%)

    • Sarcoidosis: ATG (2, 6%); muromonab‐CD3 (1, 3%)

    • Pulmonary hypertension: ATG (6, 18%); muromonab‐CD3 (1, 3%)

    • Bronchiectasis: ATG (0, 0%); muromonab‐CD3 (1, 3%)

    • Scleroderma: ATG (4, 12%); muromonab‐CD3 (0, 0%)

    • Other: ATG (1, 3%); muromonab‐CD3 (1, 3%)

  • Transplant procedure (No., %)

    • Single lung: ATG (27, 79%); muromonab‐CD3 (17, 57%)

    • Double lung: ATG (7, 21%); muromonab‐CD3 (13, 43%)

    • All patients with cystic fibrosis or severe pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure > 50 mm Hg) preferentially received bilateral lung transplantation. All other patients had single lung transplants

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • Induction was initiated based on the schema outlined for each study group. The first doses of muromonab‐CD3 and ATG were given within 24 hours of surgery, and then both drugs were continued daily for 7 consecutive days post‐transplant. Muromonab‐CD3 5 mg/d was given initially for patients > 80 kg and 2.5 mg/d for patients < 80 kg. It was then adjusted daily thereafter to maintain a peripheral CD3 count of 5% of the total lymphocyte count or 50 cells/mm³.


Treatment group 2
  • Horse ATG was started at an initial dose of 15 mg/kg/d and then adjusted daily based on the same CD3 criteria as muromonab‐CD3.


Concomitant immunosuppressive treatment
  • The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of cyclosporin, azathioprine, and corticosteroids

    • Preoperative: all patients received oral doses of azathioprine 4 mg/kg and cyclosporin 5 to 10 mg/kg.

    • Intraoperative therapy: solumedrol 500 mg IV infused before allograft perfusion.

    • Early postoperative: cyclosporin 1 to 4 mg/h IV was used, switching to oral cyclosporin as soon as an oral diet was tolerated. Daily cyclosporin levels were maintained at a level of 100 to 200 ng/dL by whole blood radioimmunoassay during the first 3 postoperative days and at a therapeutic level of 300 to 350 ng/dL by 1 week postoperatively

    • Perioperative: azathioprine, 2 mg/kg IV, was titrated to a white blood cell count of 5000 to 8000 cells/high powered field. Subsequent oral dosing of azathioprine was similar to the IV preparation. Methylprednisolone 125 mg every 8 hours was given for the first 24 hours, followed by hydrocortisone 100 mg twice daily for 3 days, then 100 mg/d. This was continued until the patient tolerated oral prednisone starting at 0.5 mg/kg to a maximum of 40 mg/d. Prednisone was tapered based on clinical stability to 0.2 mg/kg by 3 months


Follow‐up: 2 years
Outcomes
  • Early rejection

  • Infection

  • Survival

  • Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

Notes
  • Sample size calculation: not reported

  • Sources of funding: not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Pair‐wise randomisation, not further specified
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No blinding reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No blinding reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No patients were lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No protocol was available, but the study reported on mortality, rejection, infection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, PTLD and adverse events
Other bias Low risk Study appears to be free of other bias components