Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 14;2017(12):CD009789. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009789.pub2

Bloomer 2004.

Methods Randomised controlled trial (parallel design)
Participants Setting: laboratory; USA
n = 18 healthy women age range 19 to 31 years (9 in each group)
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Participants provided a medical history and completed physical activity and diet and supplementation questionnaires to determine eligibility. None had orthopaedic or metabolic conditions that could have affected the variables of measurement. All participants were non‐smokers, did not use oral contraceptives, anti‐inflammatory drugs or dietary supplements (i.e. antioxidants for at least the past 3 months), and all were classified as non‐resistance trained (i.e. had not performed resistance training in the past 12 months).
Interventions Intervention
268 mg vitamin E, 1 g vitamin C, 90 µg selenium
Placebo
Lactose placebo pill
3 capsules per day
Duration
18 days
Outcomes PRIMARY
Delayed onset muscle soreness in both arms using a visual analogue scale (0 to 10 cm) where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "unbearable pain"
Soreness was measured following active movement of elbow flexion or extension, as well as following light palpitation by the investigators
SECONDARY
Maximum isometric force was performed on the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Ronkonkoma, NY). Participants were secured in the Biodex chair by shoulder and lap belts. Participants were asked to perform 3 maximal isometric unilateral contractions with their elbow flexors each lasting 3 seconds with 60 seconds rest in between each effort.
Range of motion was measured both relaxed and flexed at the elbow. Range of motion was calculated as relaxed minus flexed.
Exercise type 4 sets of 12 repetitions of non‐dominant elbow flexors at an angular velocity of 20°/second
Sources of funding None
Notes Authors were contacted on 3 October 2013 to request raw data for delayed onset muscle soreness and maximal voluntary isometric contraction and responded on 1 November 2013
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk No details in manuscript
Authors were contacted on 24 May 2016; response: "Likely via coin flip or random number selection"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Response: "Blinding code retained by person not associated with research and/or provided in sealed envelope"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants completed the study with 100% compliance
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk No published protocol available
All outcomes reported at all time points
Adverse effects of antioxidant supplementation were not reported
Other bias Low risk Participants were non‐resistance trained and relatively inactive
Participants were asked to refrain from using other supplements or anti‐inflammatory medication and oral contraceptives