Bryer 2006.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial (parallel design) | |
Participants | Setting: laboratory, USA n = 18 young, untrained males who did not weight train for 6 months, mean age 24.4 (SEM 1.7) years Inclusion/exclusion criteria All participants were prescreened, in good health, abstained from vitamin or herbal supplements for at least 6 months and were free of any muscular injuries |
|
Interventions |
Intervention Vitamin C supplementation (3 g per day) Placebo Starch pills 3 capsules per day and participants were asked to keep food records Duration Supplementation given 2 weeks prior and 4 days after exercise |
|
Outcomes |
PRIMARY Delayed onset muscle soreness was assessed by means of a linear scale from 1 to 10 in a rested position and in response to palpation on the arms of the muscle where 1 is "no pain" and 10 is "extreme pain" SECONDARY Isometric force was conducted on an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex System 3 Isokinetic Dynamometer, Biodex Medical Systems, Shirely, NY). Participants performed 3 concentric maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) and the forces were recorded for both the dominant and non‐dominant arms through a full range of motion at a speed of 1.75 rad/second. The highest force obtained with no movement of the lever arm was accepted as the maximum isometric force. Range of motion was assessed on both arms using a goniometer placed on markings from the medial aspect of th elbow of the humerus. |
|
Exercise type | 70 eccentric actions using the elbow flexors | |
Sources of funding | None | |
Notes | Authors were contacted via email on 25 November 2013 to request data for delayed onset muscle soreness, maximal voluntary isometric contraction and range of motion, but did not respond | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details in manuscript Authors were contacted via email on 25 November 2013 but no information was provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Participants were given numbered containers for the 3 capsules per day Authors were contacted via email on 25 November 2013 but no information was provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details provided in the manuscript Authors were contacted via email on 25 November 2013 but no information was provided |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details provided |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants completed the study with no adverse outcomes |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No published protocol available All outcomes reported at all time points Adverse effects of antioxidant supplementation were not reported |
Other bias | Low risk | Participants were asked to refrain from using any supplements; medication and diet was controlled in both groups |