Poewe 1998.
| Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, parallel design Randomisation: not described Setting: multicentre (Germany and Austria) Duration: 8 weeks |
|
| Participants | 75 participants enrolled (BtA 250 U group = 19; BtA 500 U group = 18; BtA 1000 U group = 18; placebo group = 20). % Female: all groups: 48% Mean age, SD: all groups: 47 years, 11.5 Mean CD duration, SD: all groups: 7.4 years, 6.7 CD severity (Tsui modified scale): BtA 250 U: 14.3; BtA 500 U: 13.1; BtA 1000 U: 14.5; placebo: 14.4 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
| Interventions |
BtA: Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA); vials of 500 U, diluted with 1 mL sterile solution Placebo: 0.125 mg of human serum albumin and 2.5 mg of lactose, diluted with 1 mL sterile solution Study drug preparation: BtA provided in vials by Speywood Pharmaceuticals Muscles injected: a total of 2.5 mL of the study drug or placebo was injected in each participant (0.75 mL into 2 sites in the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and 1.75 mL into 2 sites in the splenius capitis muscle) EMG guidance: no BtA dose per participant: 250 U, 500 U, or 1000 U |
|
| Outcomes |
Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
| Notes |
Study discontinuations, reasons: BtA 250 U: n = 0 BtA 500 U: n = 2 (11%), lost to F/U: n = 2 BtA 1000 U: n = 0 Placebo: n = 0 |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with placebo or total dose of 250, 500, or 1000 Dysport units of botulinum toxin type A in a double blind prospective study design" Comment: insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgement of ‘low risk or high risk |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Comment: sequentially numbered drug containers of identical appearance |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with placebo or total dose of 250, 500, or 1000 Dysport units of botulinum toxin type A in a double blind prospective study design" Quote: "All three vials were identical in appearance" |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement of low risk or high risk |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement of low risk or high risk |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "One patient in the 500 unit group was lost to follow up and had to be excluded from result analysis. A further case of 500 unit group had missed one follow up visit and was excluded from efficacy analysis but included in analysis of adverse events" Comment: reasons for missing outcome data unlikely to be related to true outcome |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the expected outcomes that are usually evaluated in intervention trials for this condition were reported in this study. |
| For‐profit bias | High risk | Quote: "Toxin and placebo preparations was supplied by Speywood Pharmaceuticals Ltd" |
| Enriched population – preferential enrolment of positive responders | Low risk | Comment: all participants were previously untreated with botulinum toxin type A |
| Enriched population – exclusion of poor responders | High risk | Quote: "Seventy five patients (...) with rotational torticollis and hyperactivity clinically confined to one splenius capitis and the contralateral sternomastoid muscles" |