Charles 2012.
| Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, parallel design Randomisation: carried out in blocks of four; method not described Setting: multicentre (22 centres in the USA, 1 in Canada) Duration: 10 weeks |
|
| Participants | 170 participants enrolled (BtA group = 88; placebo group = 82) % Female: BtA: 70%; placebo: 80% Mean age, range: BtA: 55 years; placebo: 55 years Mean CD duration: BtA: 11.2 years; placebo: 9.1 years Mean CD severity, SD (CDSS): BtA: 9.2, 4.8; placebo: 9.3, 4.2 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
| Interventions |
BtA: Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA); 25 ng of neurotoxin complex protein per 100 U, diluted with 1 mL sterile solution Placebo: 0.5 mg of human serum albumin and 0.9 mg of sodium chloride Study drug preparation: BtA provided in vials by Allergan Muscles injected: the doses and muscles injected were determined by the physician based on clinical assessment EMG guidance: no BtA dose per participant: maximum: 360 U; mean, range: 236 U, 91 U‐360 U |
|
| Outcomes |
Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
| Notes | This was a 2‐period clinical trial consisting of a 10‐week open‐label period followed by a 10‐week double‐blind period, with up to 6 weeks between periods. Participants who successfully completed the open phase (i.e. responded to BtA and were compliant with the study protocol) were enrolled into the blinded phase. 214 participants were enrolled in Period I, of whom 170 continued into Period II. We only considered the results of the blinded phase in this review. Study discontinuations, reasons: BtA: n = 11 (13%), lack of efficacy: n = 8, unrelated reasons: n = 3 Placebo: n = 24 (29%), lack of efficacy: n = 19, unrelated reasons: n = 5 |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: method of randomisation not specified |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: method of concealment not specified |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: blinding not specified although study described as double‐blind |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: blinding not specified although study described as double‐blind |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: blinding not specified although study described as double‐blind |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: post‐randomisation exclusions were described as related to lack of efficacy or administrative reasons |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the expected outcomes that are usually evaluated in intervention trials for this condition were reported in this study |
| For‐profit bias | High risk | The study was supported by Allergan. |
| Enriched population – preferential enrolment of positive responders | High risk | Comment: to enrol in the study, participants had to have had at least 2 previous successful treatments with ≤ 360 U of Botox administered at 12‐ to 16‐week intervals. Also, all participants enrolled in phase II were compliant to treatment during phase I trial. |
| Enriched population – exclusion of poor responders | High risk | Quote: "Pure anterocollis and isolated head shift was exclusionary" |