Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;2017(12):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub5

Chouinard 2005.

Methods Country: Canada
 Recruitment setting: Inpatients with cardiovascular disease (MI, angina, CHF) or PVD, unselected by motivation
Participants 168 past‐month smokers
 Av. age 56
 Intervention delivered by a research nurse
Interventions 1. Counselling by research nurse (1 x 10 ‐ 60 mins, av. 40 mins, based on Transtheoretical Model, included component to enhance social support from a significant family member), 23% used pharmacotherapy
 2. As 1, plus telephone follow‐up, 6 calls over 2 m post‐discharge, 29% used pharmacotherapy
 3. Control: cessation advice, 11% used pharmacotherapy.
Outcomes Abstinence at 6 m (sustained at 2 m and 6 m)
 Validation: Urine cotinine or CO
Notes 2 interventions combined versus control in high‐intensity subgroup. 1 versus 2 used in higher versus lower comparison
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Cluster randomization was used... by first randomly assigning individuals to predetermined clusters of three to six subjects. The group assignment was then randomly assigned to each of these clusters."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Individuals not familiar with the study were in charge of the randomization procedure, which included inserting the information into envelopes that were sealed and would be opened by the investigator only at the time of treatment."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 4 deaths and 3 not meeting follow‐up criteria excluded from MA; all other dropouts and those lost to follow‐up counted as smokers; similar numbers in all arms