Meysman 2010.
Methods | Setting: Surgical wards in 4 Flemish hospitals Recruitment: inpatient smokers on surgical wards | |
Participants | 358 adult smokers admitted for surgery; randomized to experimental (178) or control (180) groups 63% men, mean age 43.2, 39% smoked > 20 cpd, 61% 10 ‐ 20 cpd Motivation to quit not required | |
Interventions | 1. Brief nurse‐led counselling session; SoC assessed, and appropriate advice given, i.e. precontemplators got risks of smoking and health gains after cessation, contemplators got barriers and pitfalls to quitting, + raising self efficacy, and preparers were either referred to a SC counsellor of agreed a cessation plan with the nurse
2. Standard booklet on smoking cessation Level of intensity: High |
|
Outcomes | Self‐reported continuous abstinence on discharge and at 6 m post‐discharge Validation: None | |
Notes | New for 2013 update. Intervention delivered by qualified smoking cessation nurse 4 in control group and 9 in experimental group used some form of pharmacological smoking cessation aid |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Participants stratified by SoC. Method of randomization not specified |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not specified |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Participants lost to follow‐up counted as smokers, exact numbers not provided |