Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;2017(12):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub5

Risser 1990.

Methods Country: USA
 Setting: Nurse‐staffed health promotion clinic
Participants 90 smokers attending health promotion clinic for annual visit
Interventions 1. 50‐min session, self‐help materials, offer of training and counselling programme
 2. as 1, plus 10‐min personalized motivational intervention with spirometry, CO measurement and discussion of symptoms
Outcomes PP abstinence at 1yr
 Validation: expired CO
Notes Not in main comparison: effect of additional components
 No group without intervention. (No true control group)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not specified
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 6/45 lost to follow‐up in control group, 13/45 lost to follow‐up in treatment group; counted as smokers in final analysis. "Although attrition was unevenly distributed in the two groups, the reasons for attrition were distributed similarly in both groups."