Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;2017(12):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub5

Vetter 1990.

Methods Country: UK (Wales)
 Recruitment setting: general practice (family practice)
Participants 226 smokers aged 60+ in general practice who completed a health questionnaire. Unselected by motivation to quit
Interventions 1. Letter asking participant to visit doctor who advised on importance of stopping smoking, opportunity to see practice nurse who gave advice on lifestyle factors concentrating on quitting smoking
 2. No contact, completed questionnaire only
 Intensity: Low
Outcomes PP abstinence at 6 m
 Validation: expired CO (cut‐off point not stated)
Notes Intervention included nursing and physician advice
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not specified
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 10% lost to follow‐up in intervention group; 9% lost to follow‐up in treatment group. Participants lost to follow‐up counted as smokers