| Methods |
Study design: randomised controlled trial Setting/location: Sidi‐ Bouzid. Tunisia Study period: 9 months Sample size calculation: the ideal sample size was estimated to be 120 based on a rate of success of treatment of 80%, 30%‐45% self‐healing in the vehicle group (type I error = 0.01and type II error = 0.10), and 10%‐20% loss to follow‐up |
|
| Participants |
Type of Leishmania: L major Inclusion criteria: aged 2‐60 years, single lesion diagnosed by the presence of parasite in stained dermal smears, no previous anti‐leishmanial treatment Exclusion criteria: known allergy, adverse reactions to aminoglycoside antibiotics, multiple lesions, an active lesion measuring > 5 cm in diameter, if their ulcerated lesion had already persisted for more than 4 months, lesions < 3 cm from the eye, who by the physician's judgment required systemic antimonial treatment: participants with serious concomitant diseases, under medication for other illnesses likely to interfere with this study; pregnant women or nursing mothers. N randomised: 132. Paromomycin group: 66; vehicle: 66 Withdrawals: 17. Paromomycin group: 9; vehicle: 8 N assessed: 115. Paromomycin group: 57; vehicle: 58 Mean age (SD): paromomycin group: 19.2 years ( 2.31); vehicle: 18.2 years (1.65) Sex (ratio M:F): paromomycin group: 1.04; vehicle: 1.07 Baseline data:
|
|
| Interventions |
Type of interventions:
Duration of intervention: twice daily for 14 days Duration of follow‐up: 105 days |
|
| Outcomes |
Healing rates: percentage of participants with complete re‐epithelisation of the lesion, 2.5 months after treatment initiation (105 days) Parasitological cure: percentage of lesions with negative smear and culture, 2.5 months after treatment initiation (105 days) Adverse effects Time points reported: days 15, 45, 105 |
|
| Notes |
Study funding sources: this investigation received funding from the United Nations Development Program/World Bank/World Health Organization Special Program for Research and TraininginTropical Diseases(grant ID:TDK910677) Possible conflicts of interest: none declared |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The tubes containing drug or placebo were supplied by the WHO/TDR, randomly numbered, and were given in numerical order to patients as they were admitted into the study." |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The tubes containing drug or placebo were supplied by the WHO/TDR, randomly numbered, and were given in numerical order to patients as they were admitted into the study." |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The code remained unknown to patients and investigators until the study had been completed" |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The code remained unknown to patients and investigators until the study had been completed" |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | No defaults were included in the analysis |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Relevant outcomes were reported |
| Other bias | Low risk | Other items assessed correctly reported |