| Methods |
Study design: randomised, prospective, double‐blind trial Setting/location: the Saudi Hospital in Sanaa, Yemen Study period: 21 months; participants recruited from June 2006 to June 2007 Sample size calculation: not described |
|
| Participants |
Type of Leishmania: Leishmania spp Inclusion criteria: all had the clinical signs of cutaneous leishmaniasis and a majority of their cutaneous lesions were found smear positive for mastigotes. 4 participants with a negative smear preparation were diagnosed by tissue culture using NNN (Novey, McNeal and Nicolle) medium Exclusion criteria: skin lesions of more than 8 weeks duration, allergic to antimonial drugs, lactating or pregnant N participants randomised (lesions): N = 30: ILSSG, n = 10 participants (12 lesions), ILSSG + IMSSG, n = 10 (15), ILSSG + oral ketoconazole: n = 10 (13) Withdrawals: no N assessed: 30 (100%) Age: range 12‐50 years (mean 23.5, SD 14). Group 1: 12‐50 (24.3, SD 15); group 2: 13‐48 years (22.5, SD 14); group 3: 12‐49 years (25.1, SD 12) Sex (male/female): group 1, 5/5; group 2, 7/3; group 3, 4/6 Baseline data:
|
|
| Interventions |
Type of interventions:
Duration of intervention: in all groups, treatment was continued until clearance or for a maximum of 3 treatment cycles at 4 week intervals (12 weeks) Follow‐up: performed monthly for 6 months after the last treatment |
|
| Outcomes |
Clinical cure: the cure was indicated by complete re‐epithelialisation, the disappearance of oedema, induration and other signs of inflammation and a negative Giemsa‐stained direct smear of a scraping of the skin at the lesion site. In the 4 participants diagnosed only by a positive culture before enrolment, the cure was indicated by a negative culture at the end of the 12 weeks. Adverse effects Time points reported: 4, 8, 13 weeks. Adverse effects: at the end of treatment |
|
| Notes |
Study funding sources: none reported Possible conflicts of interest: none declared |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient detail was reported about the method used to generate the allocation sequence |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open trial |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "A follow‐up assessment was performed by the treating clinician, the patient and by comparing the serial photographs" Comment: open trial |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants completed the study |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All relevant outcomes were reported |
| Other bias | High risk | Sample size calculation and reporting of Leishmania spp involved was not correctly reported |