| Methods |
Study design: randomised controlled trial Setting/location: Iran Study period: not described Sample size calculation: not described |
|
| Participants |
Type of Leishmania: L major Inclusion criteria: PCR‐proven L major cutaneous infection, age > 12 years, not using anti‐Leishmania therapies during the past 2 months, duration of lesions < 4 moths Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, breastfeeding, presence of lesions on ears and/or face, number of lesions >10, history of liver or kidney disease N randomised: 120 participants (fluconazole 200 mg: 60; fluconazole 400 mg: 60) Withdrawals: 2 in the 400 mg group N assessed: 118 participants Mean (SD) age: fluconazole 200 mg, 36.45 years (15.34); fluconazole 400 mg, 35.38 years (13.81) Sex (male/female): 65/55 (fluconazole 200 mg, 30/30; fluconazole 400 mg, 35/25) Baseline data:
|
|
| Interventions |
Type of interventions:
Duration of intervention: 6 weeks |
|
| Outcomes |
Complete healing: defined as complete re‐epithelialisation of the lesions at intervals of 2, 4 and 6 weeks Adverse effects Time points reported: 6 weeks |
|
| Notes |
Study funding sources: grant from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran Possible conflicts of interest: none declared |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "The patients were then randomized into two equal groups to receive either fluconazole 100 mg or 200 mg twice daily." Comment: insufficient detail was reported about the method used to generate the allocation sequence |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 2 dropouts were reported in the fluconazole 400 mg group. ITT analysis were performed. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Our primary outcomes (Complete healing and adverse effects) were described in Methods and reported in Results. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | There was not enough information in the publication to assess if there were other biases present. |