Methods |
Study design: randomised controlled trial Setting/location: Saudi Arabia (Bahrain) Study period: 12 months Sample size calculation: not described |
|
Participants |
Type of Leishmania: not described Inclusion criteria: proved positive for Leishmania parasites (amastigotes) on microscopic examination or biopsy Exclusion criteria: not described N randomised: 62. Rifampicin: 46; placebo: 16. Rifampicin: 2 groups were analysed; group 1a (children aged 3‐11 years ‐ mean age, 7.5 years), and group 1b (adults aged 12‐65 years ‐ mean age, 33 years). 32 participants enrolled in group 1a and 30 in group 1b. Out of these, 8 participants in each group (16 in total) served as control to receive the placebo. Withdrawals: 21 participants lost to follow‐up. Rifampicin: 12; placebo: 9 N assessed: 41. Rifampicin: 34; placebo: 7. Number participants imbalanced between groups Age: range 3‐65 years; mean 20 years Sex (male/female): 43/19 Baseline data: the duration of the lesions varied between 1 and 12 months (mean 2.6 months). The lesions of CL were single or multiple and were mostly over the extremities (upper limbs 51% and lower limbs 38%) and to a lesser extent on the face 30%. Most of the lesions were active being nodular, nodule‐ulcerative, or ulcerative. 2 of the participants were members of the same family. However, the rest of the participants had a negative family history. |
|
Interventions |
Type of interventions:
Duration of intervention: 2 equally divided doses during meals for 4‐6 weeks Duration of follow‐up: 3 months |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome: percentage of participants 'cured' 3 months after treatment Secondary outcomes: duration of remission and percentage of people with treated lesions that recur up to 3 months of follow‐up Adverse effects |
|
Notes |
Study funding sources: not reported Possible conflicts of interest: none declared |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Randomized" Comment: insufficient detail was reported about the method used to generate the allocation sequence |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: "Randomized" but no further information was provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "Each subject in the control group was given placebo, which was supplied, in capsules/suspension identical in shape and colour to that given in the rifampicin group." Participants look blinded but no information about personnel were provided |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: "Double‐blinded" but no further information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | There is a 38.87% of follow‐up, the percentage is very different between the groups, and it isn't explained. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No adverse effects data available |
Other bias | High risk | Sample size calculation and reporting of Leishmania spp involved was not correctly reported |