| Methods |
Study design: randomised parallel clinical trial Setting/location: Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center (SDLRC), Isfahan, Iran Study period: not described Sample size calculation: not described |
|
| Participants |
Type of Leishmania: not described Inclusion criteria: 6‐60 years old, with positive results of leishmaniasis smear test Exclusion criteria: size of lesion > 3 cm, > 5 lesions, lesion duration > 12 weeks, lesion located on the eyelid or < 2 cm away from the eye, pregnant or lactating N randomised: 165, 55 in each of 3 treatment groups Withdrawals: 7; 3 (5.5%), participants were in the concentrated boiled extract group and 2 (3.6%) participants in the other groups withdrew from the study due to the allergic reaction to the medications N assessed: 158. Concentrated boiled extract of Cassia fistula: 52; hydroalcoholic extract of C fistula: 53; ILMA: 53 Mean (SD) age: boiled extract of C fistula: 20.6 years (12.4); hydroalcoholic extract of C fistula: 19.8 years (11.5); ILMA: 22.9 years (13.6) Sex (n,(%)): boiled extract of C fistula: male: 35 (63.6), female: 20 (36.4); hydroalcoholic extract of C fistula: male: 29 (52.7), female: 26 (47.3); ILMA: male: 25 (45.5), female: 30 (54.5) Baseline data:
|
|
| Interventions |
Type of interventions:
Duration of intervention: until complete resolution of the lesion (complete epithelialisation) or for a maximum duration of 4 weeks. Follow‐up: 3 months after completing the project, they were examined every month to assess the recurrence of the lesions |
|
| Outcomes |
Clinical and parasitological cure: lesions were considered completely cured (improvement), if the participants achieved both clinical and parasitological resolutions (negative results of direct smear). Participants were considered resistant to the treatment, if no clinical changes were observed in the lesion or it was worsened. Time to healing: comparison of complete cure time of the cutaneous Leishmaniasis lesions between 3 groups Adverse effects: allergic reaction to the medications Time points reported: week 1, 2, 3, 4, 16, complete cure |
|
| Notes |
Study funding sources: the study was self‐funded Possible conflicts of interest: there was no conflict of interest |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | The participants were randomly allocated to 3 groups using table of random numbers. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Different administration of treatments: 2 groups: apply the extract‐soaked gauze; third group: ILMA |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The numbers and reasons (allergic reaction to the medications) of withdrawals were similar and small in 2 of the groups 3.5% (3/28) in concentrated boiled group vs 3.6% (2/28) in the other groups. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The study published reports our primary outcomes: cured and adverse effects |
| Other bias | High risk | Sample size calculation and reporting of Leishmania spp involved was not correctly reported |