| Methods |
Study design: randomised controlled trial Setting/location: Bam and Mashhad in Iran Study period: not described Sample size calculation: not described |
|
| Participants |
Type of Leishmania: not described Inclusion criteria: parasitologically proven cases of CL; otherwise healthy subjects on the basis of medical history, physical examination and results of blood tests; age 12–50 years; body weight >40 kg; willingness to participate in the trial and signing the informed consent Exclusion criteria: not described N randomised: 138 participants (75 in IMMA and 63 in miltefosine) Withdrawals: 33 in IMMA and 32 in miltefosine N assessed: 42 in IMMA arm and 31 in miltefosine Age (years): not described Sex: not described Baseline data: not described |
|
| Interventions |
Type of interventions: Group 1: oral miltefosine 2.5/kg/d for 28 days Group 2: IMMA 60 mg/kg/d for 14 days Duration of intervention: not described Co‐interventions: not described |
|
| Outcomes |
Healing of their lesions and occurrence Adverse effects Time points reported: participants were evaluated weekly for 28 days and then 1 month later |
|
| Notes |
Study funding sources: not reported Possible conflicts of interest: none declared |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote:"This open N randomised controlled trial was carried out in Bam and Mashhad in Iran …" Comment: insufficient detail was reported about the method used to generate the allocation sequence. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote:"This open N randomised controlled trial was carried out in Bam and Mashhad in Iran …" |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote:"This open N randomised controlled trial was carried out in Bam and Mashhad in Iran…" |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Losses to follow‐up quite high (around 50%) Intervention group: 32/63= 50.8% Control group: 33/75= 44% |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | It is an abstract. At least they reported complete cure of cases and adverse effects. |
| Other bias | High risk | Sample size calculation, reporting of Leishmania spp involved and baseline comparability was not correctly reported |