Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 17;2017(11):CD005067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub4
Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial
Setting/location: Bam and Mashhad in Iran
Study period: not described
Sample size calculation: not described
Participants Type of Leishmania: not described
Inclusion criteria: parasitologically proven cases of CL; otherwise healthy subjects on the basis of medical history, physical examination and results of blood tests; age 12–50 years; body weight >40 kg; willingness to participate in the trial and signing the informed consent
Exclusion criteria: not described
N randomised: 138 participants (75 in IMMA and 63 in miltefosine)
Withdrawals: 33 in IMMA and 32 in miltefosine
N assessed: 42 in IMMA arm and 31 in miltefosine
Age (years): not described
Sex: not described
Baseline data: not described
Interventions Type of interventions:
Group 1: oral miltefosine 2.5/kg/d for 28 days
Group 2: IMMA 60 mg/kg/d for 14 days
Duration of intervention: not described
Co‐interventions: not described
Outcomes Healing of their lesions and occurrence
Adverse effects
Time points reported: participants were evaluated weekly for 28 days and then 1 month later
Notes Study funding sources: not reported
Possible conflicts of interest: none declared
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote:"This open N randomised controlled trial was carried out in Bam and Mashhad in Iran …"
Comment: insufficient detail was reported about the method used to generate the allocation sequence.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Quote:"This open N randomised controlled trial was carried out in Bam and Mashhad in Iran …"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes High risk Quote:"This open N randomised controlled trial was carried out in Bam and Mashhad in Iran…"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Losses to follow‐up quite high (around 50%)
Intervention group: 32/63= 50.8%
Control group: 33/75= 44%
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk It is an abstract. At least they reported complete cure of cases and adverse effects.
Other bias High risk Sample size calculation, reporting of Leishmania spp involved and baseline comparability was not correctly reported